The other day, I was working on a project â just something simple. I opened ChatGPT and thought, âLet me use a few-shot prompt for this.â
Before I knew it, I was typing stuff like:
#Context: Act like a mentor,
#Step-by-step: Break this down,
#Example: Give 3 samples,
#Self-check: Make sure nothingâs missingâŚ
At that point, I paused and laughed â I wasnât writing a prompt anymore⌠I was building a prompt system.
But guess what? It worked better than anything I tried before.
In this guide, Iâll show you how to combine multiple prompting techniques to get clearer, smarter, more accurate answers â and when to use each one.
ALSOÂ READ: Everything You Need To Know About Few-Prompting
Combining prompts isnât about making your prompt longer â itâs about stacking the right techniques to guide the LLM for a better response.
Think of it like building blocks:
⢠Zero-shot prompting gives you a quick answer with no example.
⢠Few-shot prompting teaches with a few examples.
⢠Chain-of-thought breaks it down step-by-step.
⢠Tree of thoughts explores multiple ideas before deciding.
⢠Role prompting gives the model a job to do (like âact as a lawyerâ).
By mixing these in one smart prompt, you get responses that are clearer, more structured, and closer to what you actually want.
Itâs not about overloading the prompt â itâs about giving just enough structure to get better results.
You donât need to combine prompts for every task.
But it helps when:
⢠The question has multiple layers or steps.
⢠You need accuracy (math, coding, logic).
⢠The first response wasnât deep or structured enough.
⢠You want creative ideas with clear thinking behind them.
If your prompt feels flat or the answer looks rushed â itâs probably time to combine.
The Most Powerful Prompting Combos (With Examples)
Hereâs where it gets fun.
Try these combos:
⢠Few-shot + Chain of Thought
â Give 2â3 examples, then say: âThink step by step.â
⢠Role Prompting + Tree of Thoughts
â Start with âAct as a strategist. Think of three different ways toâŚâ
⢠Zero-shot + Reflection
â Ask once, then say: âNow revise it to be more accurate.â
Example:
Act as a productivity coach. I need a better routine. Think of three versions. Then tell me which one works best and why.
Boom â way better answers.
Simple: youâre teaching the AI how to think, not just what to answer.
By combining techniques, youâre giving:
⢠Context
⢠Clear task
⢠Process
⢠Expectations
Thatâs how you move from âmehâ replies to âwow, this actually helps.â
Letâs say youâre researching something like âHow AI impacts mental health.â
Try this combo:
⢠Zero-shot: Give me a quick overview of how AI affects mental health.
⢠Chain of Thought: Now break this down into pros and cons, step by step.
⢠Reflection: What did you miss in the first answer? Add more depth with real-world use cases.
Now youâve got something that reads like an actual research assistant did it.
Writing a blog, caption, or even a sales email? Try this:
⢠Act as: Act as a content strategist.
⢠Few-shot: Here are 2 examples of similar content.
⢠Refine: Now rewrite it in a more conversational tone. Make it shorter. Keep the key points.
One idea turns into five strong versions. Fast.
Combining Prompts for Problem Solving
Example: Youâre stuck on a business idea.
Try this stack:
⢠Act like a startup advisor.
⢠Give me three unique ideas for X problem.
⢠Think step by step for how each one would work.
⢠Now compare them. Which one is strongest and why?
Youâve got research, strategy, and decision-making â all in one.
Letâs say the question is hard â like âShould I switch careers?â
Hereâs how to stack it smart:
⢠Tree of Thought: List 3 different paths I can take and the pros/cons of each.
⢠Chain of Thought: Now walk me through the reasoning for the best option.
⢠Compare: Which is the lowest risk with the highest upside?
Youâre not just getting answers â youâre getting clarity.
Want more control over the output?
Try this combo:
⢠Role: Act like a UX expert.
⢠Instruction: Walk me through the steps to improve this signup flow.
⢠Prompt Booster: Now simplify it like youâre teaching a new designer.
This mix keeps the answer smart and easy to apply.
Donât Just Ask Once â Layer Prompts Gradually
Most people give up after one prompt.
But layering is where the magic is:
1. Start general: Summarize this report.
2. Then go specific: Now focus just on marketing insights.
3. Then go creative: Turn those into 3 social media hooks.
Each prompt sharpens the output a little more. Thatâs how to get real value.
Trying to get responses in a specific layout? Mix format with role.
⢠Role: Act like a project manager.
⢠Prompt: Give me this answer in a table with columns for task, owner, and deadline.
The result? No messy blocks of text. Just clean, usable info.
The âRewriter + Explainerâ Combo
One of my favorites when I want something simpler.
Try this:
⢠Rewrite this like youâre talking to a 10-year-old.
⢠Then: Now explain why it matters in 3 points.
You get a plain English version and why it matters â fast.
Using Memory (If Available) to Layer Context
If ChatGPT memory is on, this combo hits different:
⢠Remember Iâm a solopreneur working on a digital product.
⢠Then: Based on that, give me a weekly plan to launch.
You donât have to explain everything every time. You just build on what it already knows.
Chain of Thought + Critique for Smarter Outputs
Letâs say ChatGPT gives you a result, but youâre not sure itâs right.
Use this combo:
⢠Walk me through your thinking step by step.
⢠Then: Now critique your own response â what would you improve?
Youâll be surprised how often it fixes itself.
Zero Shot First, Then Add Few Shot to Improve
Start simple, then scale up:
⢠First: What are the benefits of cold plunges? (zero-shot)
⢠Then: Here are 3 sample answers â now match this tone and format. (few-shot)
Youâll train the model to match exactly what you want â without having to explain every detail over and over.
One prompt can work. But when you combine prompts the right way, you unlock a whole new level.Â
Itâs not about being fancy â itâs about being smart.Â
Stack your structure.Â
Layer your logic.Â
Keep it simple.Â
Thatâs how you get answers that actually work.